SocialVibe.comThe Vibe
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

by Arielle Young

What can be used for fuel in this day and age? Oil and coal, of course. Hydropower, wind energy, geothermal fuel, biomass (old meat.) Old meat? Yup. Tesco, a giant British retailer that owns the Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market chain of grocery shops in Southern California, is currently having their straw house blown down by an enraged VIVA (Vegetarians International Voice for Animals.) They are protesting Tesco's program to recycle meat past its sell-by date for fuel used by biomass-to-energy plants. The purpose of these plants is to turn waste food into biofuel, which is then transferred into electricity.

meat

A report in Britain's Daily Mail states that Tesco transports about 5,000 tons of old meat per year to biomass plants, and that this amount is enough to produce electricity for 600 homes. This program contributes to Britain's effort to reduce the amount of waste food ending up in landfills and the need to explore alternate energy sources. However, what some may seem to be a weather-cycle of green global progress, others chalk this program up to be a huge, environmental failure.

    "It's a sad indictment of modern life that not only hundreds of millions of animals are killed each year in the UK, but so much meat is left over from greed and indifference. To turn this wasted meat into power might seem like a good idea at first, but you have to ask yourself, why is so much left over and why are so many animals dying to provide this excess?" Justin Kerswell, a VIVA spokesman, told the Mail. What do you have to say for yourself, Britain?

In my opinion, this is all a bit ironic, seeing that the amount of surplus of meat that isn't consumed is so great. The obvious answer (not for meat production franchises, that is) would be to hinder the farming of animals to shrink the surplus of unsold meat. VIVA might argue that point on a far stricter scale. However, I can see why the program is enacted in the first place, but this whole issue would not be an issue if humankind was not rapidly depleting the world's natural resources.

I wonder who will get their way, Tesco or VIVA? Will one stomp their feet harder than the other in the temper tantrum of truth? Tune in next week for the meaty conclusion of biomass energy resources and the slow decay of smelly, rotting controversy. Not really.

via LA Times


43 Comments   
: ?>
Bookmark and Share

Related Posts:




COMMENTS (43)
You must be logged in to post a comment.

PanaC

PanaC says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

Ugh...Vegetarians...I honestly do not believe that "VIVA", no matter how hard they may "stomp their feet", will not hinder Tesco in the slightest way

Kara Marie

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I Find That Really Odd, Using Meat For Energy. And It's Just Giving Reason To Harm More Animals. I Don't Think We Should Do It. Plus It Seems Unreasonable, 5000lbs for 600 homes. Not A Good Source.

PanaC

PanaC says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

*remove that last not...I didn't mean to have a double negative...

Michelle

Michelle says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

i agree with VIVA, using meat for energy is cruel and there are better ways to create energy.

.Ashley.Mikka.

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

Rubbish!! I have to agree with Kara Marie on this one... people are stubborn and need an awakening.

Rawr

Rawr says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I agree with VIVA if we decide to reycle meat then things could turn uglier and we could start killing more animals...=/

Rachel

Rachel says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I have to agree with VIVA, i think they shouldn't have as much meat if 5,000 lbs a year is left over. Plus that much meat only produces enough electricity for 600 homes, that's a lot of meat i think they could come up with a better source of energy and not make such a big surplus.

Ally!

Ally! says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

this is really a brilliant idea if you ask me... the "bad" meat is just going to take up space in landfills, so why not convert it into a fuel source... i dont think we should start killing animals just for the fuel source though, thats not cool

Lacey

Lacey says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I would have to agree with the VIVA guy...

sticks.stones.techno

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

this is so sick....
what we need to do is just accept the fact that we as humans have evolved past the need for meat

come on people
its easier than it looks

and as for the fuel thing
corn, not meat. WAY more efficient and less gross don't you think?

MonksPoint

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I don't totally agree with VIVA or Tesco. If you shrink the supply of meat, prices go up. Using the meat to produce power is better than just throwing it away. What should be done in my opinion is: Any meat that isn't sold by the end of the "sell-by date" should be frozen and given to food shelters.

gabbiesaysily

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

okay lets think about this,so many people dont care what a vegetarian thinks.so okay,if one person doesnt want enery cuz its made by animals dont use it.ta da.dotn go around forcing other people to join with you. i wouldnt use it.and you wouldnt use.but whos to say 600 other people wouldnt either.i am a vegetarian but i dont go around advertising it.making people want to be like me.if you do more power to you.but forreal.im christian and i dont shove it down peoples throats eithers.calm down for a minutee! i mean seriously.let everyone live their own lives.

LilJohnAY

LilJohnAY says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

If the animals are ALREADY DEAD,
because they were killed for us to eat,
and now it's rotten, no one can eat it,
WHY THE HELL would anyone get upset that we're using it for energy??

At least it means the animals died for a LITTLE reason, as opposed to no reason at all.

cinematicxx9

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

Ugh. Poor animals ):

madelyn vincentt :)

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

i think alternative energy sources are great. but surplus meat? spare an animals life by not killing it in the first place. it'd help Tesco save money anyways

madelyn vincentt :)

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

another point: meat rots eventually and it'll decompose in a landfill over time.

firestarlight

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I think it's ridiculous to slaughter so many animals that there's that much rotten meat left over by the end of the year.

Jeffrey

Jeffrey says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I have to say that, really can you be so thick? The animals aren't being and wouldn't be grown for energy usage. It's just that people are starting to dust off their brains and have only begun tapping into alternative energy sources. Why not try to use the "scrap" for some sort of good?

Tori ;]

Tori ;] says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

As long as they're not killing more animals to provide for fuel and only using the leftover old uneatable meat, I honestly do not see a problem with this.

nostalgic_lies

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

If it's *old* meat then recycle it by all means. Otherwise it'll get thrown away. Tesco don't get surplus meat on purpose so it'll go off, obviously they want to sell it. Animals were made to be eaten. Fact. They're not producing surplus meat for energy, this is the meat that doesn't sale that goes off. Wouldn't you rather have them recycle it instead of just throwing it away??? Maybe you lot should read the whole story! THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT MEAT THAT'S PAST IT'S SELL BY DATE NOT JUST KILLING ANIMALS FOR AN ENERGY SOURCE.

NathanRxNarcotic

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

there were people from the city in the park all day i belive that is called alchesco, there was a little lady strugling with bags from TESCO, then a little boy came along to help her...but before she could thank him he hit her over the head and took all her jewlery and wallet. haha lily allen

Meg

Meg says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

sounds like a good idea to me. i wouldn't want them to kill extra animals for it, but i meannn they've already killed them and now they're just going to be thrown away.. so why not turn it into energy?

vegan society is a little bogus at times anyways^.^

kissingcolors

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

i don't think this is a bad idea, and lets be honest people will never ever stop eating meat. so all the bad meat might as well be put to good use. how about you try and find a way to create energy!...thought so.

MaddiCake!

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

Ridiculous. Go VIVA!

Kaitlyn

Kaitlyn says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

There are good points on both sides...
but the animal was already killed, so why is VIVA worrying about Tesco?
It's kind of pointless. At least the meat isn't just getting thrown in the trash.

cyndicaaa(:

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

grr who cares? if it can be used to make engery (which we need) rather than sit in a landfill (which we dont). and if theyre only using expired meat; then whats the problem? no ones gunna eat it anyways, may as well make it useful

Nik Tragyk

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

And yet again, vegans hinder society by being controlling pricks. And yet again, socialvibe posts a blog that is mostly just annoying.

Big news, VIVA! Mankind just announced that even if you stop TESCO from turning extra meat into energy, NO ONE IS GOING TO GO VEGETARIAN BECAUSE OF IT. Way to play the right game, guys. Why don't you spend that goddamn charity money people keep giving you on something that will make a difference for once.

JCCAKES

JCCAKES says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

alternative forms of energy use so much more water than our current dependents. there's no right answer.

thegirlwhocriedwithyou

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

they should donate the "left over" meat for impoverished people and the homeless.

thegirlwhocriedwithyou

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

forget what i said earlier. :l

GirlieInThe RabbitHole

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

"...this whole issue would not be an issue if humankind was not rapidly depleting the world's natural resources."
Agreed.

Tayla

Tayla says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

wow!!!!!:)

BottleRocket

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

um, the animals are already dead why not use the bad meat for something useful? it doesnt automatically mean that twice or three times as more animals are gonna get killed just to use for energy or whatever. if we're not gonna eat it whats the big deal? come on people, vegetarians aint gonna rule the world. desperate times call for desperate measures.

lainsna317

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

i'm vegetarian and this kind of disgusts me.
what would disgust me even more if they killed animals just for this. i understand a little if they used expired meat that they couldn't sell of the market, but if they kill the animals just for this... its wrong.

Ryan

Ryan says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

uhh, i don't think you people are reading this correctly. they are only using the meat that was spoiled on the shelf, its not like they are killing the animals to do this. you should be mad they were throwing it away before, now that is wasting it

» moi.

» moi. says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

Sounds like a fine idea to me.

DavidmC

DavidmC says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I think that Tesco has a great Idea! sure we kill more animals than we need but at least we're putting the excess to good use!

nissha

nissha says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

maybe they could think of another way to have an alternative energy source

Malicious Mallory

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

Well, the animals shouldn't be killed in the first place,
but they might as well not be killed for nothing.

Lili Couture

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

Now chickens will end up being endangered.
So, we'll be making fuel to power stuff and keep things going which is stupid because now everyone will die of hunger. That's dumb, maybe if they were a little smarter and tryed a little harder, they'd find a different and more reasonable alternative.

emmasoccergirl

POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

If there is that much meat left over than they should stop making so much, instead of wasting it then turning it into something else.

Fiona

Fiona says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

I'm on Tesco's side... And I'm a vegetarian.
The animals are already dead, and it would be a bigger problem and worry if all that meat was being wasted. The fact that it's being put to good use (producing electricity) is definitely a positive. I don't understand why VIVA are so bothered. They should only be bothered if more animals are being killed, to provide more electricity. WHICH ISN'T THE CASE. I don't see a problem with what Tesco are doing, I'm all for it. Good for them.

bri_16

bri_16 says:
POSTED 2 YEARS AGO

It's not slaughtering more animals if it's left over meat, and I doubt they would lie about how much meat they have left over. Vegetarians don't like the fact that we eat meat anyway, so why would they like this idea? i think it's perfectly fine.


  1. On World Refugee Day, Help Put an End to Genocide
  2. What Would it Cost to End World Hunger?
  3. Saudi Woman Arrested for DWF (Driving While Female)
  4. Elephants Never Forget
  5. Clean & Declutter to Help Charity
  6. Great News: TV is Good for You
  7. 3 Minutes of Fun Facts about Presidents
  8. Blind Faith: Atheists Know the Most About Religion
  9. When Recycling Kills
  10. New Study: Racism is bad for Your Health

The Latina Diaries: Can a Latina be a Vegan?

POSTED 13 DAYS AGO
 
[...] photo source [...]
 

Not Mice « CollTales

POSTED 30 DAYS AGO
 
[...] our stomach is full of red flags about it. That’s because before some Russians started training cats to behave more like dogs for a...
 

Givfe

POSTED 30 DAYS AGO
 
Givfe says:
This is why i picked this cause, there are people out there who are dying..
 

19 months from launch to $1,000,000,000 acquisition: Instagram « Rational Idealist

POSTED 1 MONTH AGO
 
[...] but that on it’s own is not worth 1/30th of world hunger. [...]
 

grandpabear

POSTED 1 MONTH AGO
 
If you are so hot; why the heck is there nothing going on here for months and years at a time???